Gender
Bias in the movie The Avengers
Critical
Discourse Analysis is a multidisciplinary approach that combines linguistics,
semiotics and socio-politics to inspect discourse and communication. Since it
is multifaceted, its theories or methods cannot be “precisely” delimited. It
pays attention to both broad and minute details of discourse to bridge together
language and society. Its main objective is to foreground the problems
prevailing in a particular society and analyse them with a more flexible and
diversified stance. The main topics that interest Critical Discourse analysts
include class, gender, ethnicity, race, religion, nationality and myriads of
other areas that can prove to be potential precursors to prejudice or
inequality in any form.
Its
second characteristic is critically examining text and talk. CDA lays stress on
the role of language in reproduction or resistance of power relations or
inequality, and for Critical Discourse analysts it is essential to study
carefully the fine divisions of verbal and semiotic details in a conversation and
develop equivalence by setting out the flaws of the dominant community. CDA’s
aim is to investigate both social power and patterns of discourse control. Van
Dijk mentions that politicians control government discourse, journalists
control media discourse, scholars control academic discourse, judges control
verdicts, etc. These are all forms of controlling institutional discourses and
they are legal as long as one does not misuse the authority that falls in one’s
own area of jurisdiction. CDA comes into focus when any of these elites misuses
the power bestowed upon them.
Van Dijk gives us a detailed description of
how power and dominance are inter-related in relation to text and discourse formation,
relating macro level socio-cognitive perception and ideologies to micro level
text and talk, in order to find out how power and dominance is manifested,
produced and reproduced through discourse.
The ideological division of society, based on genders, is quite visible in the
movie The Avengers.
The Avengers is very much a male-focused movie. Whedon, despite
being the writer and director, was working with a specific set of characters
more or less assigned to him, as the movie is an ensemble of already existing
comic characters. In that context, Whedon could have done a better job within
the confines of the movie that features male superheroes like Captain America,
Thor, Iron Man, Hulk, Nick Fury, Hawkeye and Loki.
The Avengers Assemble is fun and exciting that is bound to please the
crowds. The movie has everything one
might possibly wish for and dream of in an action-adventure blockbuster: from
superheroes, Viking Gods and Aliens to Nuclear weapons, car chases,
gunfights and invisible flying military bases. However, unfortunately, it seems
to be all about the guys, almost all the time, as it appears to be held back by
old superhero comic book clichés that prevent the girls from joining in the
action.
Sadly, the movie suffers from the Smurfette Principle. Coined by feminist
writer Katha Pollitt, the Smurfette Principle is when a male ensemble features
one female character. Pollitt asserts that the problem here is that “boys
define the group, its story and its code of values. Girls exist only in
relation to boys” (Gender & Society, Spring 2013). It is problematic
that among half a dozen male heroes, Black Widow is the only female team
member. The male Avengers contain multiple personalities, but in women’s
representation, there’s just one female Avenger.
The movie does not have the hallmarks of
promoting feminism. There are two other important female characters in the film, Agent
Maria Hill played by Cobie Smulders and Pepper Potts played by Gweneth Paltrow. But, both
of them aren’t given
much to do and are simply taken for granted. Pepper Potts role is so limited in this movie that
her strength can only be inferred from the Iron Man films.
As the sole female
protagonist and the one getting second footing to most of the male heroes,
Black Widow presents many problems. The
Avengers team had six members in all, so one wonders as why not have 2 female
superheroes in one film. Therefore, there could have been room for more than one woman in that
group. So, seeing more
diverse personalities set right with another female superhero would have been a
delight.
The lone female Avenger is Natasha Romanoff, aka Black Widow, played by Scarlett
Johansson. She is a highly trained spy,
assassin and martial arts master. Troubled by a
dark past, she’s a daring fighter owning a razor sharp mind and a remarkable skill
for interrogation. However, while Black Widow uses “feminine wiles” as a method
of manipulation, her opponents foresee weakness in her because of her gender. She
cleverly uses and takes advantage of their stereotypical gender biases to her
advantage though. Black Widow is a powerful character, no denying it, but the abilities
that she does have also play off negative stereotypes of women. She’s sneaky
and manipulative. She puts on shows of emotion to trick her enemies into giving
her information, or to convince her teammates.
Black Widow is shown to be a strong, independent
character, as
she is presented as intelligent, cunning, resourceful, physically powerful and
well-trained in the various skills of combat. Nevertheless, none of this
is ever emphasized, celebrated or highlighted. No one questions whether
she can or will be brave enough to handle herself during the epic battle or put
up a fight with the bad guys. When she does her various heroics, she does it
purely because she's the only one who isn't otherwise distracted and it has to
be done.
Our only female superhero
doesn’t fit in with the other (male) superheroes as she isn’t a real superhero,
and is pretty much the weak one in the team. She is a fighter with incredible
flexibility and skillfulness, but in the end, she is only a human, as weak
compared to her male partners, almost all of whom have superpowers. Black Widow
frequently finds herself in the “damsel in distress” position in the movie,
despite supposedly being on equal Avengers grounds with the others. We find her
fleeing away, terrified and helpless from The Hulk and being saved from falling
wreckage by Captain America’s shield.
Black Widow is an
integral part of the team. She’s the one who thinks they should all work
together and brings them together when trivial disagreements and overstated egos
threaten to divide them. It is
Natasha who ultimately ends the last battle being the only one to realize that
they must close the gateway in order to stop the invasion of the alien army. Although she plays a big
role in saving the world, we may suppose that it could have been done so by any
other Avenger or a non-Avenger character.
Interestingly, of the
six Avengers, Black Widow gets the third most
screen time. However, her screen time involves being
subject to the authority of men. She is under the control of Nick Fury (a black man). By looking at Black
Widow, we realize that the reflection of the reality of women and the
socially-constructed ideologies regarding them are being presented through her.
We must admit that she does not exist in an equal world, very much similar
to the organisation she is part of, which reflects this bias in its members.
In other words, she has to use her perceived weaknesses to achieve her goals,
which also means being subjected to the patronizing gaze of her "male
superiors." Black Widow really should be treated more equally by her
fellow heroes, regardless of gender. She is a proficient scout, strong, physically,
emotionally and intellectually, only lacking super
powers which give the other members an edge over her.
Another major issue with the movie is that The Avengers
does not pass the Bechdel Test. Bechdel Test is mainly a test of gender bias,
which checks whether a work of fiction features at least two women who talk to
each other about something other than a man. Nowhere in the movie do any of the
named female characters talk with one another. The other two supposedly
important female characters in the movie, Agent Maria Hill and Pepper Potts are never seen interacting with each
other, although Hill is shown to be interacting with some of the male members
of the team.
Both Widow and Hill work for SHIELD. It could have
been possible for them to have a scene or two in order to exchange a few lines
over to each other. The movie only contains three named
female characters, and at no point do any of them have a conversation together
about anything. It is disappointing to see a piece of work from a reputed feminist
writer/director like Whedon to fail the test in the sheer lack of their lack of
interaction.
This reflects the deeply embedded social and
cultural ideologies about gender, which are present in people of both sexes. Certainly,
most viewers do not realise how women are well positioned as sexual diversions
and sidekicks rather than important characters to the plot. This humiliating
application of female bodies is revealed throughout the movie by the women’s
contrasting wardrobes, means of fighting, and significance to their male
counterparts. As a result, the women who appear in the film, like Scarlett
Johansson, are hyper-sexualized in comparison to the male actors.
The Black Widow’s form fitting, non-protective outfit can be
compared to Iron Man’s indestructible
iron suit of his own invention, within which he remains hidden and shielded
from outside danger. The armour signifies Stark’s genius, as he engineered it
himself and uses the suit to protect the world from danger. In some scenes,
Stark is dressed in comfortable and casual clothing when not in action as Iron
Man. Hence, this juxtaposition between Romanov and Stark illustrates an utterly
misogynist contrast leading one to question these choices.
The
contradiction in the male and female characters suggests of the anticipated
audience for The Avengers. “The man controls the film fantasy and also
emerges as the representative of power…” (Gender
& Society). In order to make sure that the “male gaze” is pleased
without being intimidated by the female lead, The Avengers portrays the familiar
notion “‘for distinguishing between male and female in mental life… call
everything that is strong and active male, and everything that is weak and
passive female’” (Gender & Society). This
feature is weakened by her “passive” style of combat, featuring “traditional
notions of female power, including manipulation, sexuality, and masquerade…” (Gender & Society).
Romanov is seen as telling a series of lies to
trick the Hulk into meeting with her when she is given the mission of
recruiting the Hulk for the Avengers team. She asks him to return to
S.H.I.E.L.D. headquarters to help protect the Earth, and when he asks, “What if
I say no,” Romanov gently responds, “I’ll persuade you.” In another scene, Romanov
takes the chance to initiate a friendly conversation with their recently
captured villain, which shortly becomes harsh as the male prisoner threatens
the well being of Romanov’s loved one and verbally abuses her with
inappropriate words regarding her gender. Romanov retreats from the prisoner’s
cell at that point and turns away in distress, apparently sobbing, but implements
deceit and manipulation to overcome her enemy and obstacles.
Romanov’s “action” scenes are more passive than the
male protagonists, and are thus defined as “feminine” whereas theirs are
“masculine.” Furthermore, Romanov’s missions usually require her to regroup the
male members of the Avengers and her services are used in ensuring that the men
are equipped with the tools necessary to succeed. While she may fight alongside
her male counterparts, she does not participate in the final epic action.
Finally,
looking at Iron Man’s ability to travel throughout different universes contrasts
with Black Widow’s permanence on Earth, which “seems to exemplify the divisions
between female and male spheres: the home as a bounded and rigidly ordered
interior space as opposed to the boundless and undifferentiated space of an
infinitely expanding frontier” (Gender & Society).
Such contrasting constructions create different
impressions of their importance to the audience. In the last scene of The
Avengers, in the aftermath
of the destruction of Manhattan, citizens come out of hiding and survey the
damage done to their world. A number of distressed women are seen crying,
praying, and embracing others. Artists paint murals and drawings on walls of
the male heroes, while people are shown to be admiring and worshiping them. However,
no one seems to give credit to Black Widow for her contribution as she is not a
hero.
Hegemonic thoughts are created by dominating
agencies and are promoted by the society or media. From the perspective of
Critical Discourse Analyst, we see how in this movie, the binary of us and them
has been created purely based on gender difference. The identity given to women
is that of weak and insignificant, no matter how valuable their services are. Also,
the collective identity of men being the real heroes is created, and it is by
and large accepted without question, thus proving that ideology is never
objective.
Work Cited:
1) Duke, Shaun. 'The World In The Satin Bag: Black Widow (The Avengers): Late Thoughts On Feminism'. Wisb.blogspot.com. N. p., 2012. Web.
14 May. 2014.
2)
Gender
& Society, Spring 2013,. 'Avenging Equality: Discrimination In The Avengers'.
N. p., 2013. Web. 14 May. 2014.
3) Kearns, Megan. '‘The Avengers,’ Strong Female
Characters And Failing The Bechdel Test | Bitch Flicks'. Btchflcks.com.
N. p., 2014. Web. 14 May. 2014.
4)
Kleefeldoncomics.com,.
'Kleefeld On Comics: Avengers Isn't Feminist'. N. p., 2012. Web. 14 May. 2014.
5)
Mendelson, Scott.
'Why The Avengers May Be This Summer's Most Pro-Woman Blockbuster'. The
Huffington Post. N. p., 2014. Web. 14 May. 2014.
6) Review, The. 'The Avengers Review | Feminist Fiction'. Feministfiction.com.
N. p., 2014. Web. 14 May. 2014.
No comments:
Post a Comment