Marxist
Criticism (1930s-present)
Whom
Does it Benefit?
Based on the theories of Karl Marx
(and so influenced by philosopher Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel), this school
concerns itself with class differences, economic and otherwise, as well as the
implications and complications of the capitalist system: "Marxism attempts
to reveal the ways in which our socioeconomic system is the ultimate source of
our experience" (Tyson 277).
Theorists working in the Marxist
tradition, therefore, are interested in answering the overarching question,
whom does it [the work, the effort, the policy, the road, etc.] benefit? The
elite? The middle class? And Marxists critics are also interested in how the
lower or working classes are oppressed - in everyday life and in literature.
The
Material Dialectic
The Marxist school follows a process
of thinking called the material dialectic. This belief system maintains that
"...what drives historical change are the material realities of the
economic base of society, rather than the ideological superstructure of
politics, law, philosophy, religion, and art that is built upon that economic
base" (Richter 1088).
Marx asserts that "...stable
societies develop sites of resistance: contradictions build into the social
system that ultimately lead to social revolution and the development of a new
society upon the old" (1088). This cycle of contradiction, tension, and
revolution must continue: there will always be conflict between the upper,
middle, and lower (working) classes and this conflict will be reflected in
literature and other forms of expression - art, music, movies, etc.
The
Revolution
The continuing conflict between the
classes will lead to upheaval and revolution by oppressed peoples and form the
groundwork for a new order of society and economics where capitalism is
abolished. According to Marx, the revolution will be led by the working class
(others think peasants will lead the uprising) under the guidance of
intellectuals. Once the elite and middle class are overthrown, the
intellectuals will compose an equal society where everyone owns everything
(socialism - not to be confused with Soviet or Maoist Communism).
Though a staggering number of
different nuances exist within this school of literary theory, Marxist critics
generally work in areas covered by the following questions.
Typical questions:
- Whom does it benefit if the work or effort is accepted/successful/believed, etc.?
- What is the social class of the author?
- Which class does the work claim to represent?
- What values does it reinforce?
- What values does it subvert?
- What conflict can be seen between the values the work champions and those it portrays?
- What social classes do the characters represent?
- How do characters from different classes interact or conflict?
Here is a list of scholars we
encourage you to explore to further your understanding of this theory:
- Karl Marx - (with Friedrich Engels) The Communist Manifesto, 1848; Das Kapital, 1867; "Consciousness Derived from Material Conditions" from The German Ideology, 1932; "On Greek Art in Its Time" from A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy, 1859
- Leon Trotsky - "Literature and Revolution," 1923
- Georg Lukács - "The Ideology of Modernism," 1956
- Walter Benjamin - "The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction," 1936
- Theodor W. Adorno
- Louis Althusser - Reading Capital, 1965
- Terry Eagleton - Marxism and Literary Criticism, Criticism and Ideology, 1976
- Frederic Jameson - Marxism and Form, The Political Unconscious, 1971
- Jürgen Habermas - The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, 1990
No comments:
Post a Comment