Pages

Thursday, 1 December 2016

Modern Literature: Bertrand Russell

Modern Literature:
Bertrand Russell belongs to modern era. The most important characteristic of modern literature is that it is opposed to the general attitude to life and its problems adopted by the Victorian writers. This rebellious mood affected the 20th century literature, which was directed by mental attitudes, moral ideas and spiritual values diametrically opposed to those of the Victorians. Nothing was considered certain; every thing was questioned. In the field of literary technique also some fundamental changes took place. Standards of artistic workmanship and of aesthetic appreciation also underwent radical changes.

The simple faith of Victorians was replaced by the modern man’s desire to probe and question. There was a disintegration of values in the 20th century. The result was that the modern writers could no longer write in the old manner. The modern mind was out raged by the Victorian complacency. The social and religious reforms at first raised this complaint, and they were followed by the men of letter because they echo the voice around them. But there was felt the need of a change in the sphere of literature also because the idiom, the manner of presentment, the play of imagination, and the rhythm and structure of the verse, of the Victorian writers were becoming stale, and seem gradually to be losing the old magic. There words fail to evoke the spirit. Thus a reaction was overdue in the field of literature, because the art has to be renewed in order to revitalize it. At the end of the Victorian era it was felt that the ideas, experiences, moods and attitudes had changed, and so the freshness which was lacking in literature had to be supplied on another level.
Themes of 20th Century Literature:
There was a disintegration of values in the twentieth century. The result was that the modern writers could no longer write in the old manner. If they played on such sentiments as the contempt for money, divine love, natural beauty, the sentiment of home and life, classical scholarship, and communication with the spirit of the past, they were running the risk of striking a false note. Even if they treated the same themes, they had to do it in a different manner, and evoke different thoughts and emotions from what were normally associated with them. The modern writer had, therefore, to cultivate a fresh point of view, and also a fresh technique.
The twentieth century has become the age of machine. Machinery has, no doubt, dominated every aspect of modern life, and it has produced mixed response from the readers and writers.
One great advantage under which the modern writers labour is that there is no common ground on which they their readers meet. In the atmosphere of disillusionment, discontent and doubt, different authors show different approaches to life. Some lament the passing of old value, and express a sense of nostalgia. Some show utter despair of future; while others recommend reverting to an artificial primitivism. Some concentrate on sentiment, style or diction in order to recover what has been lost. Thus among the twentieth century writers are sometimes found of aggressive attempts to retain or revitalize old values in a new setting or, if it is not possible, to create new values to take their place.
The twentieth century literature which is the product of this tension is, therefore unique. It is extremely fascinating and, at the same time, very difficult to evaluate, because to a certain extent, it is a record of uncoordinated efforts. Though it started as a reaction against Victorianism in the beginning of the 20th century, it is closely bound up with the new ideas which are agitating the mind of the modern man.
Bertrand Russell’s contribution in 20th Century Literature:
Along with G.E. Moore, Russell is generally recognized as one of the founders of modern analytic philosophy. Along with Kurt Gödel, he is regularly credited with being one of the most important logicians of the twentieth century. His most influential contributions include his defense of logicism (the view that mathematics is in some important sense reducible to logic), his refining of the predicate calculus introduced by Gottlob Frege (which still forms the basis of most contemporary logic), his defense of neutral monism (the view that the world consists of just one type of substance that is neither exclusively mental nor exclusively physical), and his theories of definite descriptions and logical atomism.
 Over the course of his long career, Russell made significant contributions, not just to logic and philosophy, but to a broad range of subjects including education, history, political theory and religious studies. In addition, many of his writings on a variety of topics in both the sciences and the humanities have influenced generations of general readers.
 As A.J. Ayer writes (1972, 127),
“The popular conception of a philosopher as one who combines universal learning with the direction of human conduct was more nearly satisfied by Bertrand Russell than by any other philosopher of our time,”
And as W.V. Quine tells us (1966c, 657),
“I think many of us were drawn to our profession by Russell's books. He wrote a spectrum of books for a graduated public, layman to specialist. We were beguiled by the wit and a sense of new-found clarity with respect to central traits of reality.”
Russell spent the 1950s and 1960s engaged in various political causes; primarily related to nuclear disarmament and opposing the Vietnam War (see also Russell Vietnam War Crimes Tribunal). The 1955 Russell–Einstein Manifesto was a document calling for nuclear disarmament and was signed by 11 of the most prominent nuclear physicists and intellectuals of the time. He wrote a great many letters to world leaders during this period. He was in contact with Lionel Rogosin while the latter was filming his anti-war film Good Times, Wonderful Times in the 1960s. He also became a hero to many of the youthful members of the New Left. In early 1963, in particular, Russell became increasingly vocal about his disapproval of what he felt to be the US government's near-genocidal policies in South Vietnam. In 1963 he became the inaugural recipient of the Jerusalem Prize, an award for writers concerned with the freedom of the individual in society. In October 1965 he tore up his Labour Party card because he feared the party was going to send soldiers to support the USA in the Vietnam War.
Political and social activism occupied much of Russell's time for most of his life, which makes his prodigious and seminal writing on a wide range of technical and non-technical subjects all the more remarkable. Russell remained politically active almost to the end of his life, writing to and exhorting world leaders and lending his name to various causes. He was also famously noted for saying "No one can sit at the bedside of a dying child and still believe in God."
Also noted for his many spirited anti-war and anti-nuclear protests, Russell remained a prominent public figure until his death at the age of 97.



References:

http://www.synaptic.bc.ca/ejournal/russell.htm

No comments:

Post a Comment